What is crystal clear during these #ImpeachmentHearings are the FACTS ARE ON THE PRESIDENTS SIDE! Nothing has changed. Not a single one of the Democrats "star witnesses" confirmed that there was a quid pro quo. In fact, when asked if they had evidence of bribery, they said NO!
. @RepRatcliffe nails it. Democrats poll-tested, and they found that the crime of “bribery” alarms voters the most. The only problem is… none of the witnesses say they witnessed any “bribery.” They’re accusing @realDonaldTrump of a crime 1st and searching for evidence 2nd! pic.twitter.com/byTgMzIQW9
Schiff’s sham impeachment is collapsing. https://twitter.com/repmarkmeadows/status/1196852655055867906 …
In the 3,500 pages of transcripts released so far, there was only one reference to bribery. Ironically to describe Vice President Biden’s conduct, not President Trump’s. Why did we go from quid pro quo to extortion now to bribery? The answer is polling. pic.twitter.com/2ypnc6HyDT
Lt. Col. Vindman says he doesn’t know the “Whistleblower’s” identity. @RepAdamSchiff claims he doesn’t know the “Whistleblower’s” identity. So how is asking who Lt. Col. Vindman spoke to “outing the ‘Whistleblower?’”
Pelosi now claims this charade is all about "bribery." The problem with that focus-group-tested narrative? No witness has used the word "bribery" to describe @realDonaldTrump's conduct. In fact, "bribery" has only ever been mentioned in the context of Biden's alleged conduct. pic.twitter.com/6RZKgFPV48
FACT CHECK: True. • Republicans are on • Democrats can’t hide the facts in their secret bunker anymore. • The President did nothing wrong. https://twitter.com/chadpergram/status/1196837430567096321 …
Schiff just shut down Ranking Member @DevinNunes to advise one of his star witnesses on how to answer a question about the whistleblower. But Schiff likes to claim he doesn't know who the whistleblower is... So then how would he know Nunes is asking about the whistleblower? pic.twitter.com/QT06yMcRC7
If Adam Schiff & LTC Vindman don’t know who the “whistleblower” is, how would they know that naming the one person LTC Vindman spoke to in the intelligence community would out the “whistleblower”?